Scar Contractures, Hypertrophic Scars, and Keloids

Anthony E. Brissett, M.D., and David A. Sherris, M.D.

ABSTRACT

A scar contracture is the result of a contractile wound-healing process occurring in a scar that has already been re-epithelialized and adequately healed. Keloids and hyper­trophic scars (HTSs) are fibrous tissue outgrowths that result from a derailment in the normal wound-healing process. The exact incidence of keloids and HTSs remains un­known. Beyond the common belief that trauma is the initiating event of keloid and hy­pertrophic scar formation, the remainder of the process remains uncertain. A combina­tion of biochemical factors, skin tension, endocrinologic factors, and genetic factors are the likely culprits. Treatment begins by educating the patient about the etiology of the scarring process. All treatment protocols are individualized, but the standard approach to keloids and HTSs begins with corticosteroid injection followed by surgical excision, pres­sure dressings, and long-term follow-up.

KEYWORDS: Contracture, hypertrophic, keloid, scar

Keloids and hypertrophic scars (HTSs) are fi­brous tissue outgrowths that result from a derailment in the normal wound-healing process. The first descrip­tion of keloids dates back to approximately 1700 be in the ancient Egyptian writing of the Smith Papyrus doc­uments.' Even today, African sculptures, drawings, and body scarification depict various patterns developing from hypertrophic scars that may indicate kinship, stature, or acts of bravery (Fig. 1).2 The term Cheloide was initially described by Alibert in the early 1800s. The root "Chele" is adopted from the Greeks and means "crab claw." This describes the keloid lateral outgrowths and crablike extensions into surrounding tissue}'4

Peacock et al. have provided us with the descrip­tion of hypertrophic scars and keloids that is commonly used today. By their definition, an HTS is described as a fibrous tissue outgrowth with excessive scarring that re-mains within the confines of the wound (Fig. 2A). A keloid, on the other hand, is characterized by its ability to spread outside the boundaries of the original lesion (Fig. 2B). An additional form of abnormal wound healing is the scar contracture. By definition, a scar con­tracture is the result of a contractile wound-healing process occurring in a scar that has already been reep­ithelialized and adequately healed (Fig. 2C).6 Scar con­tractures typically appear as a fixed, rigid scar that con-tributes to both cosmetic and functional problems. It is imperative that the reconstructive surgeon differentiates among these three forms, as they require different treat­ment modalities.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

The exact incidence of keloids and HTSs remains un­known. Numerous reports on the incidence of keloids in the Black population vary anywhere between 5 and 15%7-9 In a review of 175 cases of keloids from various races, Alhady and Sivanantharajah found that keloids were 15 times more likely to occur in darker-skinned individuals.

Figure 1 Hypertrophic scar of a Nuba man., (With permission.)

Although keloids can occur at any age, they are most likely to occur between the ages of 10 and 30 years. The incidence is equal in both men and women.11-13 The formation of keloids has been de-scribed to follow both an autosomal dominant and au­tosomal recessive transmission pattern.11,14,15 Keloid formation has not been associated with HLA-A or HLA-B antigens.76 There is an increased frequency in individuals with connective tissue disorder such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome as well as Rubinstein-Tavbi disease and Scleroderma.17,15

ETIOLOGY

The traditional approach to the normal wound-healing process consists of three phases: the inflammatory or exudative phase, the proliferative or granulation phase, and the wound contraction or remodeling phase. The inflammatory or exudative phase begins immediately upon injury and comprises the disruption of blood ves­sels leading to the influx of serum proteins, platelets, clotting factors, and collagen. Activated platelets release growth factors, fibrinogen, and fibronectin, which pro-mote cell migration into the wound.19,20 A rapid in-crease in fibroblast numbers and in epithelial cell mitoses as well as an increase in the synthesis of extra-cellular collagen and proteoglycan content characterizes the second phase. Reepithelialization intensifies during this stage.21 Wound contraction is characterized by a decrease in fibroblasts, macrophages, and wound vascu­larity. The contraction component in this phase is believed to be the result of myofibroblasts, which cause the wound to contract by 0.6 to 0.75 mm per day11,22 Contemporary thoughts describe primary, secondary, and tertiary stages of wound healing. In this model all aspects of wound repair occur simultaneously in differ­ing degrees of intensity.Z3 A derailment in this process of wound healing contributes to keloid formation, scar contractures, and hypertrophic scarring.

Despite extensive research, the exact mechanism that results in an overly exuberant healing response re-mains elusive. Several theories have been proposed to assist in our understanding of this process. The central theme in the development of excessive scarring is trauma. However, reports of keloids developing sponta­neously with no history of antecedent trauma exist;78 the inciting event may not have been recognized by the patient.

Beyond the common belief that trauma is the initiating event the remainder of the process remains uncertain. A combination of biochemical factors, ten­sion, and endocrinologic factors are likely culprits.

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is be­lieved to be essential in wound repair. PDGF is the principal mitogen in the serum for mesenchymally de-rived cells and is the first growth factor shown to be chemotactic for neutrophils, monocytes, fibroblasts, and smooth muscle.24 It has also been shown that PDGF has a beneficial effect in models of impaired wound heaung.24-28 Although these studies evaluated PDGF in situations of poor healing, one can begin to speculate about the effect of PDGF on the development of an ex­cessive extracellular matrix.

Transforming growth factor B (TGF-B) is criti­cal to normal wound healing but may also contribute to keloid formation.29-32 Peltonen et al. described an in-crease in fibroblasts as well as type I and VI collagen in active keloids. Moreover, TGF-Bl mRNA and protein were detected in an area active in type I and VI colla­gen expression. Peltonen et al. concluded that an initial step in keloid fibrotic reactions involves the expression of the TGF-B1 gene by neovascular endothelial cells, thus activating the adjacent fibroblast to produce markedly elevated levels of TGF-Bl as well as type I and VI collagen.33

Mechanical tension and strain on wound edges is one of the most important known extrinsic factors linked to the development of HTSs and keloids.6,22,29 Increased mechanical tension within the wound may translate to changes in phenotypic expression of fibro­blasts. Keloids and HTSs are more common in wounds closed under tension. Anatomic sites under exceptional skin tension such as the shoulder and presternal area de­velop keloids and HTSs at increased rates. Scars that traverse the relaxed skin tension lines at right angles are subject to constant tension as a result of contraction of the underlying musculature and may become hypertrophic. Pierced earlobes, however, are also common sites for keloid formation, despite minimal tension on the wound, possibly due to chronic chemical irritation from the posts or irritation from inserting and removing the earrings.

Keloids have a tendency to enlarge during pu­berty and pregnancy and may resolve at the time of menopause. It has also been reported that keloid fibro­blast have increased androgen binding when compared when normal fibroblasts.

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS

The time between the onset of trauma to the develop­ment of scar can vary. Both forms typically develop within 1 to 3 months following trauma, although keloid formation may occur up to 1 year later." The majority of keloids and HTSs are asymptomatic. Most patients will be referred for cosmetic or functional concerns, but some patients may complain of pruritus. This symptom can be explained by an overabundance of mast cells as well as increased histamine levels found within keloid tissue and may increase in intensity during times of ac­tive keloid growth.

Apart from the extension of keloid tissue beyond the confines of the original scar, the appearance of keloids and HTSs is similar. In the Caucasian popula­tion, they often appear as a raised, firm, reddened tissue outgrowth that has a tendency to pallor over time. In more darkly pigmented individuals, these lesions are uniformly hyperpigmented with little if any color change over time.

The most common location for the development of keloids in the head and neck is the earlobe. In a retro­spective review of head and neck keloids over 15 years, Lindsey and Davis found that 55% (111/202) of the keloids occurred on the earlobe. Of these cases, 110 de­veloped following ear piercing. The next most likely area included the deltoids and trapezius (43/202), fol­lowed by the sternal notch (15/202), and then the postauricular area (11/202). Keloids of the chin, fore-head, lateral face, and neck were relatively uncommon (Table 1). In this review, there were no cases of keloids that occurred within the midface or around the upper or lower eyelids.'s

Malignant transformation of keloids has been re-ported in several poorly documented cases.36 Because the presentation of keloids may be similar to that of cu­taneous malignancies or dermatofibroma sarcoma pro­tuberans, histopathologic confirmation may be neces­sary to exclude malignancy.

TREATMENT

As previously indicated, it is imperative for the head and neck surgeon to properly identify the type of scar as a wound contracture, hypertrophic scar, or keloid as this information will dictate the most effective form of treatment. A scar contracture can be identified by its re­strictive nature as well as its confinement to the area of trauma and its lack of fibrous tissue outgrowths. Keloids and HTSs, on the otherhand, all have some degree of fi­brous outgrowth. HTSs remain with the confines of the wound and typically decrease in size over time as op-posed to keloids, which may have phases of quiescence followed by reactivation and enlargement.

Scar Contracture

As with most things in medicine and life, "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." This old adage certainly applies to all scars. The avoidance of scar con­tractures starts with careful planning of the surgical in­cision. Incisions that are placed parallel to relaxed skin tension lines or that may have irregular angles are more likely to heal in a satisfactory manner without func­tional or cosmetic problems. Additional strategies and techniques useful in preventing scar contractures were published in the mid-1960s and have led to the wide-spread use of pressure, positioning, splints, and range­of-motion (ROM) exercises in an attempt to prevent the development of scar contractures 3739 The exact mechanism of splints is unclear. Linares et al. described a form-fitting neck splint and face mask utilized to de-crease the formation of scar contractures in patients with significant burns to the face and neck.40

Despite the surgeon's best efforts, scar contrac­ture undoubtedly occurs. In most cases, surgical inter­vention results in significant improvement but should not be undertaken until the wound-healing phase has been completed, between 6 and 12 months.

Z-plasties, multiple Z-plasties, and local flap re-construction are often necessary to adequately release scar contracture.6 Webbing of the medial canthus, oral commissure, and neck are especially amenable to single or multiple Z-plasty reconstruction. It is important to utilize pressure and ROM exercises to prevent contrac­ture development following revision. In addition, the use of triamcinolone acetonide (10 mg/ml; Kenalog 10, Westward-Squib, Buffalo, NY) intralesional injection

Table 1 Common Locations for the Development of Keloids

Patients (No.)	Race	Keloid Location	Cause
111	98B, 10W, 3A	Earlobes	110 Piercing, IT
43	30B, 13W	Deltoid and trapezius	30T 101, 2S, 1 BT
15	10B, 5W	Sternal notch	8T, 4ST, 31
11	11W	Postauricular	11 Rhytidectomy
7	5B, 2W	Chin	7T
5	4B, 1W	Forehead	5T
5	4B, 1W	Lateral face	5T
5	3B, 1W, 1A	Neck	3T 11, 1 S

There was a total of 202 patients: 154 Blacks, 44 Whites, and 4 Asians. A total of 31 recurrences were re-ported. T indicates trauma; I, insect bite or sting, S, surgical trauma; BT, blunt trauma.34 Modified from Lindsey and Davis, Archives of Otolaryngology, 1997.

Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids

Although a plethora of treatments exists for HTSs and keloids, no single treatment has been particularly suc­cessful, and results are moderately successful at best. The treatment of HTSs and keloids begins with appro­priate surgical planning and gentle handling of the soft tissue. Incisions should be oriented along the lines of re­laxed skin tension to minimize tension, dead space should be eliminated, and suture should be minimized to reduce foreign body reaction. Favorable suture mater­ial has been studied extensively and remains controver­sial. In general, suture materials stimulate an inflamma­tory response. Foreign body reaction in the wound is more extensive with the absorbable compared with non-absorbable sutures, multifilamentous compared with monofilamentous sutures, and inflexible and superfi­cially implanted sutures.41 Treatment begins by educat­ing the patient about the etiology of the scarring pro­cess. It has been our experience that these patients are in search of a panacea, of which there is none. All proto­cols are individualized, but the standard approach to keloids and HTSs begins with corticosteroid injection followed by surgical excision and pressure dressings. Al-though the remainder of this article deals with individ­ual treatments, to obtain the best outcome a combina­tion approach is mandatory.

CORTICOSTEROIDS

The use of intralesional as well as topical corticosteroid has enjoyed extensive coverage in the literature and is the mainstay of the treatment of HTSs and keloids.6,21,42-44 The success of corticosteroids on reduc­ing scar formation stems from its ability to decrease fi­broblast proliferation, collagen synthesis, and glycos­aminoglycan synthesis as well as suppress inflammatory mediators.6,21 In a developing keloid or HTS treatment is begun with direct, serial, intralesional injections. Triamcinolone acetonide (10 mg/ml; Kenalog 10, Westward-Squib, Buffalo, NY) is injected intralesion­ally with a 25- or 27-gauge needle at 4- to 6-week intervals. Injections are discontinued when the scar is stable, when surgical intervention is imminent, or if side effects develop. The steroid solution must be injected directly into the lesion. Extravasation into the sur­rounding normal tissue may result in tissue atrophy, hy­popigmentation, and telangectasia.

The treatment of preexisting keloids begins with three, monthly, intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml; Kenalog 40, Westward-Squib, Buffalo, NY) mixed with equal parts of 2% lidocaine 1:100,000 epinephrine (Table 2). Although the effec­tiveness of intralesional corticosteroids prior to excision is debatable, this regime is critical for several reasons. First, rare forms of keloids and HTSs are extremely re­sponsive to intralesional injections alone. Second, al-though mixed with anesthetic, these injections can cause a burning sensation, patients need to be aware of the level of discomfort because of the necessity of post­excisional injections. Finally, because the treatment de­mands close long-term follow-up, pretreatment compli­ance is important to assess.

An alternative to injection is the use of topical steroids. Because of their relatively poor tissue absorp­tion through intact or sutured skin, topical steroids help to prevent abnormal scar development in relatively su­perficial lesions only, such as those occurring from dermabrasion.6.45 The use of 1% hydrocortisone or Flurandrenolide-impregnated tape can prevent or decrease abnormal scarring with these superficial-type wounds.

SURGICAL

Druit first described surgical excision of keloid tissue in 1844.46 Although surgical excision is the most long-standing, simplest, and only definitive way of removing keloid tissue, its effectiveness as a single mode of treat­ment is limited and sometimes futile. Recurrence rates following surgical excision alone approach over 80%. Some authors have reported rates as high as 100%, with the vast majority of keloids redeveloping within the first 2 years following excision.47'4s Almost every aspect of surgical excision has been debated, including type of in­strument used to make the incision, total versus subtotal excision, healing by secondary intention versus primary closure, as well as suture type. Gentle handling of tis­sues, minimal use of cautery, judicious use of suture ma­terial, removal of residual inflammatory tissue, and the reorientation of scars within the lines of minimal ten­sion are generally accepted as necessary components.

Table 2 KeloidTreatment Protocols

Time Treatment Regimen

0 . Injection 7: Equal parts triamcinolone acetonide, 40 mg/mL, and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

1 month . Injection 2: Same as injection 1

1 month . Injection 3: Same as injection 1

1 month . Surgical excision of keloid and injection 4: triamcinolone acetonide, 10 mg/mL

5-7 days . Suture removal-application of silicone gel sheeting or pressure dressing

1-3 weeks . Injection 5:1 part triamcinolone acetonide, 40 mg/mL, to 3 parts 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

4-6 weeks . Injection 6: Same as injection 5; begin tapering gel sheeting

4-6 weeks . Injection 7: Same as injection 5

4-12 weeks . Continue injections as needed to prevent recurrence, consider pressure dressing at signs of recurrence

Each time given is counted from the previous step of the protocol., Modified from Sherris et al. Otolaryngol Din North Am, 1995.

The use of a CO2 laser versus cold steel for exci­sion of keloids has not been shown to reduce the rate of recurrence when used as a single treatment modal­ity.49s0 Leaving a rim of tissue behind following exci­sion has shown to result in decreased recurrence and may offer some advantages. Engrav et al. reported an improved outcome with intramarginal versus extramar­ginal excision.51 As indicated previously, surgical exci­sion alone is likely to result in recurrence, and therefore intralesional corticosteroids are recommended follow­ing excision. These injections are continued every 4 to 6 weeks for 6 months. Patients are followed every 3 months for a minimum of 2 years.

PRESSURE

The use of pressure to treat keloids was initially de-scribed in 1835.21 It was not until the 1960s that the use of pressure in both the prevention and treatment of keloids, HTSs, and scar contracture became popular­ized by physicians treating burn victims at the Shriners Hospital.

Some of the explanations proposed include a decrease in blood flow with a resultant decrease in alpha2-macroglobulin and a subsequent increase in collagenase-mediated collagen breakdown, normally inhibited by alpha2-macroglobulin.

Lower levels of chondroitin 4-sulfate, with a subse­quent increase in collagen degradation.

Decreased scar hydration, resulting in mast cell stabi­lization and subsequent decrease in neovasculariza­tion and extracellular matrix production.

Excessive hypoxia, resulting in fibroblast degenera­tion and collagen degradation.

The use of pressure in the head and neck is limited due to vital structures and irregular contours. The area most amenable to the use of pressure dressings is the ear lobe. An ear press, which is a modification of a pressure clip described by Agrawal et al., is used for the treatment of patients with ear lobe keloids.S2 Pressure application is begun immediately following reepithelialization of the wound. Patients should wear these clips continuously for the first several weeks, removing them only for hy­gienic purposes, and then slowly taper their use over several months. Patient compliance is a major factor with the use of pressure clips. The modification to the original design of the ear press is its ability to accommo­date silicone gel sheeting (Fig. 3A, B).

SILICONE GEL

Perkins and Walis first described the use of silicone gel sheeting for the treatment of scars in burn patients in 1982.53 Since that time, several articles have been published documenting improved appearance of scars fol­lowing the application of a semi-occlusive silicone gel sheet.54,55 Silicone gel sheeting is fabricated from cross-linked silicone polymers of a 3.5-mm thickness.21 The exact mechanism of action of silicone gel sheeting is un­clear. It has been postulated that the occlusive nature of gel sheeting decreases evaporative water loss and thus improves hydration. It is believed that hydration results in decreased capillary activity, a decrease in inflamma­tory and mitogenic mediators, and a decline in collagen synthesis.21 There is evidence that the use of nonsilicone gel sheeting produces similar improvements in scar ap­pearance, indicating that occlusion exclusive of silicone contributes to improvement.

Figure 3 (A) Custom ear press with silicone gel sheeting. (B) Custom ear press with silicone gel sheeting, in situ.

The application of silicone gel sheeting should begin as soon as reepithelialization has occurred. Daily application for a minimum of 12 hours is recommended and is tapered over a 1-month period. The exact dura­tion that imparts maximum benefit is unknown and re-quires further investigation. If keloids or HTSs begin to reoccur, corticosteroid injection as well as the applica­tion of gel sheeting should be resumed. In children, the use of a silicone cream is recommended due to ease of application.

RADIATION THERAPY

Debeurman and Gougerot first described the use of X-ray for the treatment of keloids in 1906.58 The use of radiation therapy is controversial because of the risk of secondary malignancy, although only a few cases have been described.59-61 Timing, duration, dose, and thera­peutic effect remain controversial. Benefit may be de-rived from the destruction of proliferating fibroblasts. The total dose recommended for the treatment of keloids varies from 1500 to 2000 rads fractionated over 7 to 10 days.

The success of radiotherapy (RT) alone for the treatment of keloids is poor, with a reported recurrence of 50 to 100%.62 In 1961, Cosman et al. introduced the concept of postexcision radiation therapy, with promis­ing results.63 Since that time, multiple studies have re-ported success rates of >80% with the use of RT follow­ing scar excision.64,6s Recurrences typically developed within 1 to 3 years. The use of interstitial RT with iridium-192 implanted into the wound site following scar excision has been described with recurrence rates ranging from 20 to 40%.21,66,67 The proposed advan­tages of interstitial implants include ease of application, irradiation of a limited volume, and comparable efficacy to external beam therapy.21

The most common sequelae following RT is hy­perpigmentation. Due to the reported risk of malig­nancy following radiation, the use of postexcision RT should be reserved for use in only the most functionally debilitated patients. RT is contraindicated in children as well as in areas of high potential carcinogenesis such as the breast and thyroid tissue.

INTERFERON

The use of interferon (INF) -alpha, -beta, and -gamma for the treatment of keloids down-regulates the produc­tion of types I, II, and III collagen.68.69 The resultant down-regulation develops secondary to decreased mRNA.21,70 Larrabee et al. evaluated the effects of in­tralesional IFN-gamma in a dose of 0.01 mg or 0.1 mg injected weekly over a 10-week interval.68 They found some degree of shrinkage in all keloids following injec­tion, with 5 of 10 patients enjoying over a 50% response, whereas the other 5 patients received less than a 50% response. Only one patient had a complete response with no evidence of recurrence at 18 weeks. Similar findings were reported by Granstein et al.

Berman and Flores reported on 124 patients treated with excision only (n = 43), excision and intrale­sional steroid injection (n = 64), or excision followed by intralesional injection of IFN-alpha-2b (n = 16). They reported a significant difference in the rate of keloid re­currence with the IFN-alpha-2b (19%) versus excision alone (51%) or with postexcisional corticosteroid injec­tions (58%).72

The most common reported adverse clinical ef­fects include fever, chills, night sweats, fatigue, myalgia, and headache. Laboratory abnormalities include re­versible granulocytopenia, elevation of hepatic transam­inase, and serum triglycerides. These adverse effects occur in a dose-dependent fashion.

ADDITIONALTREATMENT MODALITIES

As we begin to understand the mechanism responsible for abnormal wound healing, additional treatment modalities are being introduced. Many cases are anec­dotal. Some novel studies that have had positive results show promise for the future.73,74

Gassner et al. reported a statically significant im­provement in the appearance of scars when the forehead was paralyzed with botulinum toxin.74 The authors hy­pothesized that temporary paralysis of the underlying musculature surrounding the wound resulted in de-creased wound tension and improved appearance as a result. Although initial results appear promising, further investigation into this treatment modality is needed.

Numerous additional interventions have been at-tempted, including colchicine,75 beta-aminocaproic acid, d-penicillamine,76 topical vitamin A and E,77 as well as zinc-impregnated cloth.78 Although all these in­terventions address specific mechanisms within the healing process, they have not resulted in dramatic im­provements in wound appearance or the treatment of keloids 21

CONCLUSION

The development of scar contractures, hypertrophic scars, and keloids is a frustrating problem for both patients and physicians. The exact etiology and patho­genesis remains equivocal, and the current treatment options are only marginally successful. Appropriate planning of incisions and gentle handling of tissue is imperative to prevent this problem. Combinations of treatment modalities are most successful. Additional re-search into both normal and abnormal wound healing is warranted to achieve a better understanding of these processes.

REFERENCES

Breasted J. The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus, Vol 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1930:403-406

Groning K. Body Decoration, A World Survey of Body Art. New York: Vendome Press; 1998

Alibert J. Ouelques recherches sur la cheloide. Mem Soc Med D Emulat 1817:744

Alibert J. Description des maladies de la peace observees a phopital Sait-Louis et exposition des meilleures methods suives pour leur traitment, Vol 2. Brussels: Auguste Whalen; 1825:37

Peacock EE, Madden JW, Trier WC. Biologic basis for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. South Med J 1970;63:755-760

Sherris DA, Larrabee WF, Murakami CS. Management of scar contractures, hypertrophic scars, and keloids. Otolaryn­gol Clin North Am, 1995;28:1057-1068

Oluwasanmi JO. Keloids in Ibadan. Trop Geogr Med 1974; 26:231-241

Oluwasanmi JO. Keloids in the African. Clin Plast Surg 1974;1:179-195

Barrett J. Keloid, In: Birth Defects: Atlas and Compendium. Bergsma D, ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1973:553

Alhady SM, Sivanantharajah K. Keloids in various races. A review of 175 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;44:564-566

Murray J. Keloids and hypertrophic scars. Clin Dermatol 1994;12:27-97

Kamin A. The etiology of keloids: a review of the literature and a new hypothesis. S Afr Med 1964;38:913-916

Ketchum LD, Cohen IK, Masters FW. Hypertrophic scars and keloids. A collective review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 53:140-154

Cosman B, Crikelair G, Gaulin JEA. The surgical treatment of keloids. Plast Reconstr Surg 1961;27:335-358

Bloom D. A review of the literature and report of a family with multiple keloids in five generations. NY State J Med 1956;56:511-519

Cohen IK, et al. Immunoglobulin, complement, and histo­compatibility antigen studies in keloid patients. Plast Recon­str Surg 1979;63:689-695

Char F. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Birth Defects 1972;8: 300-301

Kurwa A. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and spontaneous keloids. Clin Exp Dermatol 1978;4:251-254

Howell JM. Current and future trends in wound healing. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992;10:655-663

Hom DB. Growth factors in wound healing. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995;28:933-953

Urioste SS, Arndt KA, Dover JS. Keloids and hypertrophic scars: review and treatment strategies. Semin Cutan Med Surg 1999;18:159-171

Larrabee WF, Bolen JW, Sutton D. Myofrbroblasts in head and neck surgery. An experimental and clinical study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:982-986

Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med 1999;341:738-746

Heldin C, Westermark B. Role of platelet derived growth fac­tor in vivo, In: The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair. Clark R, ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1996:249-273

Deuel TF, et al. Growth factors and wound healing: platelet-derived growth factor as a model cytokine. Annu Rev Med 1991;42:567-584

Pierce GF, et al. Role of platelet-derived growth factor in wound healing. J Cell Biochem 1991;45:319-326

Greenhalgh DG, et al. PDGF and FGF stimulate wound healing in the genetically diabetic mouse. Am J Pathol 1990; 136:1235-1246

Robson MC, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor BB for the

treatment of chronic pressure ulcers. Lancet 1992;339:23-25

Younai S, et al. Role of growth factors in scar contraction: an

in vitro analysis. Ann Plast Surg 1996;36:495-501

Roberts A, Sporn MB. Peptide growth factors and their re­ceptors, In: Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. Hei­delberg: Springer-Vet-lag; 1990

Niessen FB, et al. On the nature of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1435-1458

Peltonen J, et al. Elevated expression of the genes for trans-forming growth factor-beta 1 and type VI collagen in diffuse fasciitis associated with the eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome. J Invest Dermatol 1991;96:20-25

Peltonen J, et al. Activation of collagen gene expression in keloids: co-localization of type I and VI collagen and trans-forming growth factor-beta 1 mRNA. J Invest Dermatol 1991;97:240-248

Ford L, et al. Increased binding in keloids: a preliminary com­munication. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1983;9:545-547

Lindsey WH, Davis PT. Facial keloids. A 15-year experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:397-400

Hayrati E, Hoomand A. The keloidal diathesis: a resistant state to malignancies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;59:555-559

Gottlieb E, Prolonged postoperative cervical pressure as an adjunct to plastic surgery on the neck. Plast Reconst Surg 1963;32:600-606

Fujimori R, Hiramoto M, Ofugi S. Sponge fixation method for treatment of early scars. Plast Reconst Surg 1968;42:322-327

Cronin TD. The use of a molded splint to prevent contracture after split skin grafting on the neck. Plast Reconst Surg 1961; 27:7-18

Linares HA, Larson DL, Willis-Galstaun BA. Historical notes on the use of pressure in the treatment of hypertrophic scars or keloids. Burns 1993;19:17-21

Niessen FB, Spauwen PH, Kon M. The role of suture mater­ial in hypertrophic scar formation: monocryl vs. vicryl-rapide. Ann Plast Surg 1997;39:254-260

Friedman SJ, Butler DF, Pittelkow MR. Perilesional linear at­rophy and hypopigmentation after intralesional corticosteroid therapy. Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;19:537-541

McCoy BJ, Diegelmann RF, Cohen IK. In vitro inhibition of cell growth, collagen synthesis, and prolyl hydroxylase activity by triamcinolone acetonide. Prot Soc Exp Biol Med 1980; 163:216-222

Pollack SV, Goslen JB. The surgical treatment of keloids. J Dermatol Surg On col 1982;8:1045-1049

Goslen JB. The role of steroids in preventing scar formation. In: Thomas JR, GR, eds. Facial Scars: Incisions, Revisions, and Camouflage. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1989:83-97

Druit R. Modern Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa.: Lea and Blan­chard; 1844

Dacosta J. Modern Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1903

Cosman B, Wolff M. Correlation of keloid recurrence with completeness of local excision. A negative report. Plast Re­constr Surg 1972;50:163-166

Norris JE. The effect of carbon dioxide laser surgery on the recurrence of keloids. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:44-49; discussion 50-53

Apfelberg DB, et al. Preliminary results of argon and carbon dioxide laser treatment of keloid scars. Lasers Surg Med 1984;4:283-290

Engrav LH, et al. A comparison of intramarginal and extra-marginal excision of hypertrophic burn scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:40-45

Agrawal K, Panda KN, Arumugam A. An inexpensive self fabricated pressure clip for the ear lobe. Br J Plast Surg 1998; 51:122-123

Perkins K, Davey RB, Walis KA, Silicone gel: a new treat­ment for burns and contractures. Burns 1982;9:406-410

Dockery GL, Nilson RZ. Treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars with SILASTIC Gel Sheeting. J Foot Ankle Surg 1994;33:110-119

Katz BE. Silicone gel sheeting in scar therapy. Cutis 1995; 56:65-67

Ricketts CH, et al. Cytokine mRNA changes during the treatment of hypertrophic scars with silicone and nonsilicone gel dressings. Dermatol Surg 1996;22:955-959

Wong TW, et al. Symptomatic keloids in two children. Dra­matic improvement with silicone cream occlusive dressing. Arch Dermatol 1995;131:775-777

DeBeurmann R, Gougerot, GH. Cheloides des musquescies. Ann Dermatol Syphilol 1906;7:151

Alster TS, West TB. Treatment of scars: a review. Ann Plast Surg 1997;39:418-432

Bilbey JH, et al. Localized fibrous mesothelioma of pleura following external ionizing radiation therapy. Chest 1988;94: 1291-1292

Hoffman S. Radiotherapy for keloids. Ann Plast Surg 1982; 9:265

Borok TL, et al. Role of ionizing irradiation for 393 keloids. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988;15:865-870

Cosman B, et al. The surgical treatment of keloids. Plast Re­constr Surg 1961;27:335-358

Levy DS, Salter MM, Roth RE. Postoperative irradiation in the prevention of keloids. Am J Roentgenol 1976;127: 509-510

011stein RN, et al. Treatment of keloids by combined surgical excision and immediate postoperative X-ray therapy. Ann Plast Surg 1981;7:281-285

Malaker A, Ellis F, Paine CH. Keloid scars: a new method of treatment combining surgery with interstitial radiotherapy. Clin Radiol1976;27:179-183

Clavere P, et al. Postoperative interstitial radiotherapy of keloids by iridium 192: a retrospective study of 46 treated scars. Dermatology 1997;195:349-352

Larrabee WE et al. Intralesional interferon gamma treatment for keloids and hypertrophic scars. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:1159-1162

Pittet B, et al. Effect of gamma-interferon on the clinical and biologic evolution of hypertrophic scars and Dupuytren's dis­ease: an open pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93: 1224-1235

Jimenez SA, Freundlich B, Rosenbloom J. Selective inhibi­tion of human diploid fibroblast collagen synthesis by inter­ferons. J Clin Invest 1984;74:1112-1116

Granstein RD, et al. A controlled trial of intralesional recom­binant interferon-gamma in the treatment of keloidal scar-ring. Clinical and histologic findings. Arch Dermatol 1990; 126:1295-1302

Berman B, Flores F. Recurrence rates of excised keloids treated with postoperative triamcinolone acetonide injections or interferon alpha-2b injections. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37:755-757

Gassner HG, Sherris DA. Addition of an anesthetic agent to enhance the predictability of the effects of botulinum toxin type A injections: a randomized controlled study. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:701-704

Gassner HG, Sherris DA, Otley CC. Treatment of facial wounds with botulinum toxin A improves cosmetic outcome in primates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:1948-1953; dis­cussion 1954-1955

Peacock EE. Pharmacologic control of surface scarring in human beings. Ann Surg 1981;193:592-597

Schorn, D, et al. Skin collagen biosynthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with D-penicillamine. Scand J Rheumatol 1979;8:124-128

Ehrlich HP, Tarver H, Hunt TK. Inhibitory effects of vitamin E on collagen synthesis and wound repair. Ann Surg 1972; 175:235-240

Soderberg T, Hallmans G, Bartholdson L. Treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars with adhesive zinc tape. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;16:261-266